California Bar Exam Essay Books

My last post talked about where to find real MBE questions, and specifically about the books you can buy to study for the MBE. In this post, I want to talk about the two books I have experience with using to prepare for the bar. The first book I will talk about is Jeff Adachi’s book called  Bar Breaker. The second book I want to talk about is Essay Exam Writing for the California Bar Exam. These are two very different books on the same topic, and I think both have a lot to offer.

1. Bar Breaker by Jeff Adachi

Bar Breaker was highly recommended to me by a law school professor. In his book, Jeff Adachi provides a lot of insights into attacking each essay (he talks about visualizing the fact pattern), then takes some time to break down the subject into how you can think about it for the purpose of crafting an essay. Then, for some essays, especially at the beginning, he will walk you through the whole process from start to finish. It all culminates with a “model” answer written by Jeff Adachi and a self-scoring assessment sheet.

I think this book has a really great introduction for someone who has never taken the bar exam and has no idea how it is graded. This will provide a lot of insights into the grading process that I don’t think you will find in another book, or from your commercial prep course for that matter. Because Jeff Adachi provides model answers that are not straight off of the Cal Bar website, I think this gives the reader perhaps a clearer picture of what is expected in a well-written answer. Unlike some of the model answers selected by the examiners (these should be given weight, too, keep in mind), Jeff Adachi’s model answers are much shorter and to the point. He is a big proponent of keeping things brief, and I think there is a lot to be said of this writing style.

I like this book because I like how much Jeff Adachi has done to explain the actual process behind writing an essay. Where I think this book falls short is that it doesn’t provide as much in the way of actual substantive rules (it keeps referring you to another book in the Bar Breaker series) and the book needs to be edited for typos– there are lot. In terms of actual helpfulness though, I think this book is worthwhile. But, I think this book should be supplemented with another source for examples of essays written in a different style in order to stay aware of all the styles that are appropriate for the bar exam.

I also like this book because Jeff Adachi just seems like such a badass. And you can’t argue with that.

2.Essay Exam Writing for the California Bar Exam by Mary Basick

This book is so different from Jeff Adachi’s book, and I think could work as a good foil to Bar Breaker if used together. The introduction is short and to the point. Then, the book moves onto short attack outlines, longer outlines, subject testing charts, and sample essays for every subject. I really appreciate that unlike Jeff Adachi’s book, you get substantive review. I think the short attack memorization outlines are very helpful in organizing the information in a way that is capable of being memorized. However, I do feel that the outlines leave out some important substantive rules and keep others too abbreviated. If a more obscure issue gets tested on the bar, these outlines are still going to leave you scratching your head to some extent. While Barbri and Kaplan overload you with information, I think this book might have edited a little too much.

Where I think the book really falls short is in its lack of recent subject matter. Many of the sample essays are from the 90s. While this is helpful in that essays from the 90s are no longer on the Cal Bar website, it also feels slightly outdated. I also don’t like that there are only model answers for one to two essays per subject and then charted answers for the rest. I just don’t think this is necessarily as helpful as it could be. I do like that the charts bold the rule statements and fact analysis the author believes would be necessary to include in a passing score. That way, you don’t feel like you wouldn’t receive a passing score just because you happened to miss out on the obscure judicial notice issue, for example.

I used this book predominantly for the substantive content and less for the charts and practice essays. Of the two, for the purpose of studying for the essays, I think Jeff Adachi’s book has the slight edge. But, if you can afford it, I would definitely recommend purchasing both, especially if you are looking for short memorization attack outlines specifically for the essays.

Hope this helps!

Calbarista

Disclosure: The above links are linked with the amazon.com affiliate program, so should you purchase an item using the link above, Calbarista does receive a small percentage. The goal of the Calbarista blog is not to generate income, but instead to provide meaningful advice regarding the California Bar Exam. Proceeds obtained through the affiliate program will help Calbarista pay for a .com domain hopefully in the near future. Thank you for your support. 

Themis Review and Thoughts

Here are my personal thoughts on the commercial review course Themis. If you are trying to decide what review course is best for you, I hope this helps by offering some candid feedback. There’s a lot you don’t know until you take the course, which I believe most reviews online do not talk about. I’m hoping this will help shed some light on things that most reviews of Themis don’t.

Upside of Themis- PRICE!

After initially putting down a deposit on the Barbri course my 2L year, I decided to back out and go with Themis towards the end of my 3L year. I did this on a recommendation from a friend who had used Themis and passed. The main reasons I decided against Barbri and opted for Themis was price (I received the public interest discount) and the convenience of studying at home. Themis cost me just under $1000 dollars with the public interest discount. I’m under the impression that Barbri would have cost around $4,000.  I don’t believe Barbri offers you significantly more than Themis in terms of content, especially if you are stuck taking Barbri at a location which uses only video lectures (no live lectures). Therefore, it felt like a no brainer in terms of cost.

Downside of Themis (for me at least)- Surprisingly Regimented

I was attracted to Themis because I love freedom. Well, Themis is surprisingly un-free. When you sign up for Themis, they mail you the books and then provide access to the online course on a day which they have chosen in advance. If you want to access the course before that date, you have to sign up for the early access course or you are just SOL. To me, that’s one of the biggest downsides of Themis as an online course. All of their content is online aside from the books they mail you, but they don’t allow you the start the course until a specific day. Like Barbri, it’s regimented in this way. I think the reasoning behind it is that they have to update their content from cycle to cycle. I get that. But, I feel that one of the biggest selling point of Themis (in addition to price) is it’s supposed to flex schedule. Well… it’s flex only to a certain point, really, since you still have to start after their designated start date, can only submit graded essays after a certain point, and can only access simulated MBE after a designated days. To sum up, Themis really likes designated days.

Also, Themis really likes to track your progress, call you, and then send you a lot of group emails about being on top of things. If you are anything like me, this will stress you out and make you screen your phone calls all summer long. If you need constant contact, you’ll like this aspect. But, if you are the type of person who needs constant contact you probably didn’t sign up for Themis in the first place…

Downside and Upside of Themis- Lectures

Themis lecturers are pretty good for bar exam review lecturers. As you should probably expect from any review course, some lecturers are better than others (specific shout outs to Zachary Kramer the Real Property lecturer and Pamela S. Karlan the Crimes lecturer). I would say that the quality of the lecturers on Themis is probably one of Themis’ biggest upsides (since apparently their flexibility isn’t really so flexible…).

That being said, I think Themis needs to do a better job of having their lecturers edit themselves and go at a more rapid pace. Professor Kramer is great, but after 6 hours of watching property lectures I still wanted to off-myself. And I really wasn’t retaining anything after 4 hours anyway. Keeping things brief would really help move the studying along. After spending hours and hours watching lecturers, I felt like the length of the lectures actually made my studying worse. Depressing.

If you really benefit from lectures, then Themis would be a good course for you.

Downside of Themis- Graders are not ex-graders and MBE questions are not MBE questions

Essays

Some people might see this is as nitpicky and unrealistic, but I think the major shortcoming that all the big commercial review courses share is their lack of ex-graders on the payroll. My essays were graded by an attorney who probably graduated 5 years ago and has never graded for the CA bar. Sure, she is trained by Themis (and maybe even trained by an ex-grader hired by Themis), but I really don’t think she knew how to provide the nuanced feedback that only a former grader is capable of providing. While I don’t think this will be detrimental to all bar exam takers, I believe anyone choosing a commercial bar course needs to be aware of the simple fact that in all likelihood, your essays will not be graded by an ex-grader. This may set some unrealistic expectations. Make of this what you will. As far as I know, the one commercial (if you can even call them this) bar course offering essay grading from ex-graders is BarMax. More on them later.

MBE

Themis, like Kaplan and Barbri, do not provide exclusively real MBE questions written by the NCBE. To me, this is a total deal breaker. Doing real MBE questions is critical to “getting into the mind” of the MBE. Why? The MBE is tough. I guarantee it will be easier if you study from real past MBE questions. If you sign up for a course that doesn’t utilize real MBE questions, you should supplement your studying with a program or a book that uses real MBE questions. This is an added cost. Not a huge added cost, but a cost all the same.

Also, as a side note, not doing the MBE questions that Themis provides you with will bring down your “percentage completed” on the course homepage, which in turn will make Themis call you concerned about your progress. If you’re like me, you’ll find this slightly annoying.

Would I sign up for Themis again?

Not at this time. If Themis were to get licensing for real MBE questions and some ex-graders on staff, I would sign up for Themis. Until then, I think there are better choices out there.